IHU Cybersecurity Exam Notes

Source: Juni_2026_Exams/Advance_Forensics/notes/11-material-audit-and-study-plan.md

Material Audit and Study Plan

Evidence Status

Audit date: June 15, 2026

reference_pdfs/.

exercises.

The source material shows that this module is primarily practical malware analysis, not disk-image/registry forensics. Use notes/00-focus-points.md as the current priority list. The remaining sections of this older plan are useful as supplemental Windows-forensics material.

What to Master First

Priority 1: Evidence handling and navigation

Be able to do this without notes:

  1. Identify the evidence type: E01, raw/dd, segmented image, live system, or

memory dump.

  1. Record the source, work from a copy, and calculate/verify hashes.
  2. Open the image in FTK Imager or Autopsy.
  3. Identify partitions, Windows version, users, and timezone.
  4. Export artifacts while preserving their names and documenting paths.

Tools: FTK Imager, Autopsy, file, and a hashing tool such as Get-FileHash, sha256sum, or certutil.

Priority 2: Windows Registry

Master Registry Explorer and know which hive answers which question:

Important offline-hive rule: CurrentControlSet is a live-registry alias. Resolve SYSTEM\Select\Current and examine the corresponding ControlSet00x, unless the parser resolves it for you.

Tools: Registry Explorer and RECmd. RegRipper is useful as a second parser, not as a substitute for validating the source key.

Priority 3: Execution and user-activity artifacts

Practice correlating, rather than relying on one artifact:

Tools: PECmd, AppCompatCacheParser, AmcacheParser, LECmd, JLECmd, Registry Explorer/RECmd, BrowsingHistoryView or a SQLite viewer, and EvtxECmd.

Priority 4: NTFS and deleted-file analysis

Understand $MFT, $UsnJrnl:$J, $LogFile, $Recycle.Bin, resident data, file-record reuse, and the difference between metadata discovery and content recovery.

Tools: MFTECmd, MFT Explorer, Timeline Explorer, and FTK Imager/Autopsy.

An MFT entry can show that a file existed and was marked deleted; it does not automatically recover the deleted file's content.

Priority 5: Timeline and persistence

Normalize timestamps to UTC, retain raw values, and identify each source. Correlate at least two independent artifacts before making a strong claim.

Check persistence in:

Tools: Timeline Explorer, KAPE, Eric Zimmerman's parsers, Registry Explorer, Autoruns for live triage, and event-log parsers.

Priority 6: Memory forensics

Only promote this higher after checking the lectures or past exam. If a memory image is supplied, know the basic Volatility 3 workflow:

Important Corrections to Existing Notes

person's identity or ownership.

installation. Corroborate it.

prove that a target executed.

but absence is not proof that a program never ran.

exact time an individual value was created.

themselves, anti-forensic evidence.

different objects. Label the source of every timestamp.

alternate Windows installation-date artifact.

is not automatically suspicious.

Seven-Day Practical Plan

Day Work Completion test
1 FTK Imager/Autopsy, partitions, exports, hashing Open an image and produce a documented artifact folder
2 Registry Explorer: SOFTWARE, SYSTEM, SAM, NTUSER.DAT Answer hostname, users, timezone, shutdown, and Run-key questions
3 User activity: UserAssist, LNK, Jump Lists, RecentDocs Build a small evidence table without overstating conclusions
4 Prefetch, Amcache, Shimcache, event logs Correlate program execution across at least two artifacts
5 $MFT, USN Journal, Recycle Bin, deleted files Reconstruct one file's path and timeline
6 Persistence and full timeline Explain a persistence finding with file and registry evidence
7 Timed mock investigation Produce answers with source path, tool, raw value, UTC time, and confidence

Answer Format

For each finding, write:

  1. Direct answer.
  2. Artifact and exact source path.
  3. Tool/parser used.
  4. Raw value and interpreted value.
  5. Timestamp with timezone.
  6. Corroborating artifact.
  7. Confidence and limitation.

Do not include remediation unless the question asks for it. A forensic answer should distinguish observed evidence from interpretation.

Current Exam-Specific Material

The source extraction is complete:

solutions/exam-2025-verified-walkthrough.md

notes/13-lecture-exercises-step-by-step.md

The remaining requirement is hands-on verification in the university VM. Record sample-specific observations and screenshots without committing malware binaries or VM disks.